I guess my hiatus is long enough to retain my reputation as a procrastinator major campaigner. I’m running out of excuse for not writing anything in this blog. What should I write now… hmm… guess I still owe one or two book reading reports. Well then…
Freakonomics
This book really does freak me out. Never before a literature about economics and statistics can thrill me and keep me on the edge of my seat, literally. Ok, it’s not a conventional economics or statistics book, but it truly shows how powerful tool statistic can be. The author used principals of economics and statistics to explain what happens in the criminal world of crack cocaine operation, or how legalization of abortion in USA probably play a major role on the drop of crime rate, or what happens behind the decline of Klu Klux Clan power, or why we shouldn’t trust any real estate agents (not that I trust them before, anyway), just to name a few.
Steven D. Levitt made me realize that there is such person who actually really loooves to sit down behind a desk and analyzing piles of data. Fortunately for us, he’s not a typical economist, thus, there’s no brain crushing mathematical formulas on his book (another reason why I like the book). The way he used his logic and his method on seeing and analyzing seemingly ordinary things is amazing. He can reveal interesting facts behind things that normally avoiding our attentions.
Good thing that he met this journalist, Stephen J. Dubner, so that this book can be materialized to enlighten dimwits like me and maybe you.
Tom Clancy’s Powerplays: Bio Strike
This was the first Tom Clancy novel I read. I knew about his reputations as a writer of manly masochistic books about war, high-end weaponry technologies, politics and international intrigues. I even managed to take a peek at some of video games based from his novels like Rainbow Six or Splinter Cells. I wonder why it took me so long to finally read his book.
Unfortunately, this one I read was not the best on his collections. The critics’ reviews were not so good, the readers’ reviews even worse. Too bad I realized it only after I finished reading the book.
There were some inconsistencies in the storyline and setting, for example there were some confusion on location reference where a South American country president died (from Peru to Brazil and then back to Peru again… No, trust me, it doesn’t seem to be intentional). Also at least a mistake on date reference, an event was described to be happened in the year of 2000, while it should be 2001, unless they involved a time machine in the storyline—which was not the case. The bright side of this is… if a book that bears Tom Clancy’s name on its cover can afford to make mistakes, this is a good news for a newbie amateur like me… *grin grin*
One more thing to note, the pace was so slow, if you compare it to Dan Brown’s Da Vinci Code, the latter seems to be moving on speed of light.
Well, apparently this book was not really written by Tom Clancy himself. His name is more like a brand used by the publisher to boost up the book’s value. Maybe only the initial idea was from him, or maybe even nothing actually came from Tom Clancy.
Aaaaanyway, yeah, I still learned one or two things from this book, especially about writing setting and background description. The book was so detailed, too many details at some points they became unnecessary and utterly confusing.
There were a lot of characters in the book, some were quite important, most were just ignorable bystander. I needed to read carefully so that I wouldn’t confuse which is which. A particular character I like was Lathrop, a freelance spy cum mercenary cum vigilante. A mysterious character with unclear determination, is he one of the good guys or just a regular crook with thirst for money in disguise? I guess some of us are easily falling in love with curious character who sometimes dangerously flirts with the darkside.